Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23.820
Filter
1.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 13: e53790, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent need for social distancing required the immediate pivoting of research modalities. Research that had previously been conducted in person had to pivot to remote data collection. Researchers had to develop data collection protocols that could be conducted remotely with limited or no evidence to guide the process. Therefore, the use of web-based platforms to conduct real-time research visits surged despite the lack of evidence backing these novel approaches. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the remote or virtual research protocols that have been used in the past 10 years, gather existing best practices, and propose recommendations for continuing to use virtual real-time methods when appropriate. METHODS: Articles (n=22) published from 2013 to June 2023 were reviewed and analyzed to understand how researchers conducted virtual research that implemented real-time protocols. "Real-time" was defined as data collection with a participant through a live medium where a participant and research staff could talk to each other back and forth in the moment. We excluded studies for the following reasons: (1) studies that collected participant or patient measures for the sole purpose of engaging in a clinical encounter; (2) studies that solely conducted qualitative interview data collection; (3) studies that conducted virtual data collection such as surveys or self-report measures that had no interaction with research staff; (4) studies that described research interventions but did not involve the collection of data through a web-based platform; (5) studies that were reviews or not original research; (6) studies that described research protocols and did not include actual data collection; and (7) studies that did not collect data in real time, focused on telehealth or telemedicine, and were exclusively intended for medical and not research purposes. RESULTS: Findings from studies conducted both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest that many types of data can be collected virtually in real time. Results and best practice recommendations from the current protocol review will be used in the design and implementation of a substudy to provide more evidence for virtual real-time data collection over the next year. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that virtual real-time visits are doable across a range of participant populations and can answer a range of research questions. Recommended best practices for virtual real-time data collection include (1) providing adequate equipment for real-time data collection, (2) creating protocols and materials for research staff to facilitate or guide participants through data collection, (3) piloting data collection, (4) iteratively accepting feedback, and (5) providing instructions in multiple forms. The implementation of these best practices and recommendations for future research are further discussed in the paper. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/53790.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Data Collection , Pandemics , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Telemedicine/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Research Design/standards
2.
Can J Rural Med ; 29(2): 71-79, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English, French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709017

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented challenge for rural family physicians. The lessons learned over the course of 2 years have potential to help guide responses to future ecosystem disruption. This qualitative study aims to explore the leadership experiences of rural Canadian family physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic as both local care providers and community health leaders and to identify potential supports and barriers to physician leadership. METHODS: Semi-structured, virtual, qualitative interviews were completed with participants from rural communities in Canada from December 2021 to February 2022 inclusive. Participant recruitment involved identifying seed contacts and conducting snowball sampling. Participants were asked about their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the role of physician leadership in building community resilience. Data collection was completed on theoretical saturation. Data were thematically analysed using NVivo 12. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants took part from 22 rural communities in 4 provinces. Four key factors were identified that supported physician leadership towards rural resilience during ecosystem disruption: (1) continuity of care, (2) team-based care models, (3) physician well-being and (4) openness to innovative care models. CONCLUSION: Healthcare policy and practice transformation should prioritise developing opportunities to strengthen physician leadership, particularly in rural areas that will be adversely affected by ecosystem disruption. INTRODUCTION: La pandémie de COVID-19 a représenté un défi sans précédent pour les médecins de famille en milieu rural. Les leçons tirées au cours des deux années écoulées peuvent aider à orienter les réponses aux futures perturbations de l'écosystème. Cette étude qualitative vise à explorer les expériences de leadership des médecins de famille ruraux canadiens pendant la pandémie de COVID-19, en tant que prestataires de soins locaux et chefs de file de la santé communautaire, et à identifier les soutiens et les obstacles potentiels au leadership des médecins. MTHODES: Des entretiens qualitatifs virtuels semi-structurés ont été réalisés avec des participants issus de communautés rurales du Canada entre décembre 2021 et février 2022 inclus. Le recrutement des participants a consisté à identifier des contacts de base et à procéder à un échantillonnage boule de neige. Les participants ont été interrogés sur leurs expériences durant la pandémie de COVID-19, notamment sur le rôle du leadership des médecins dans le renforcement de la résilience des communautés. La collecte des données s'est achevée après saturation théorique. Les données ont été analysées thématiquement à l'aide de NVivo 12. RSULTATS: Soixante-quatre participants provenant de 22 communautés rurales de quatre provinces ont pris part à l'étude. Quatre facteurs clés ont été identifiés pour soutenir le leadership des médecins en faveur de la résilience rurale en cas de perturbation de l'écosystème: (1) la continuité des soins, (2) les modèles de soins en équipe, (3) le bien-être des médecins et (4) l'ouverture à des modèles de soins novateurs. CONCLUSION: La politique de santé et la transformation des pratiques devraient donner la priorité au développement d'opportunités pour renforcer le leadership des médecins, en particulier dans les zones rurales qui seront négativement affectées par la perturbation de l'écosystème.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Leadership , Pandemics , Qualitative Research , Rural Health Services , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Canada , Rural Health Services/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Physicians, Family , Female , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Ecosystem , Male , Rural Population
3.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1378804, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736749

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Seasonal human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) is a frequently encountered virus linked to mild upper respiratory infections. However, its potential to cause more severe or widespread disease remains an area of concern. This study aimed to investigate a rare localized epidemic of HCoV-NL63-induced respiratory infections among pediatric patients in Guilin, China, and to understand the viral subtype distribution and genetic characteristics. Methods: In this study, 83 pediatric patients hospitalized with acute respiratory infections and positive for HCoV-NL63 were enrolled. Molecular analysis was conducted to identify the viral subgenotypes and to assess genetic variations in the receptor-binding domain of the spiking protein. Results: Among the 83 HCoV-NL63-positive children, three subgenotypes were identified: C4, C3, and B. Notably, 21 cases exhibited a previously unreported subtype, C4. Analysis of the C4 subtype revealed a unique amino acid mutation (I507L) in the receptor-binding domain of the spiking protein, which was also observed in the previously reported C3 genotype. This mutation may suggest potential increases in viral transmissibility and pathogenicity. Discussion: The findings of this study highlight the rapid mutation dynamics of HCoV-NL63 and its potential for increased virulence and epidemic transmission. The presence of a unique mutation in the C4 subtype, shared with the C3 genotype, raises concerns about the virus's evolving nature and its potential public health implications. This research contributes valuable insights into the understanding of HCoV-NL63's epidemiology and pathogenesis, which is crucial for effective disease prevention and control strategies. Future studies are needed to further investigate the biological significance of the observed mutation and its potential impact on the virus's transmissibility and pathogenicity.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus NL63, Human , Epidemics , Genotype , Phylogeny , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Coronavirus NL63, Human/genetics , China/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Child , Female , Male , Child, Preschool , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Infant , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , Seasons , Mutation , Adolescent
4.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 14: 1367975, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736750

ABSTRACT

The endemic outbreak of SADS-CoV has resulted in economic losses and potentially threatened the safety of China's pig industry. The molecular epidemiology of SADS-CoV in pig herds has been investigated in many provinces in China. However, there are no data over a long-time span, and there is a lack of extensive serological surveys to assess the prevalence of SADS-CoV in Chinese swine herds since the discovery of SADS-CoV. In this study, an indirect anti-SADS-CoV IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on the SADS-CoV S1 protein was established to investigate the seroprevalence of SADS-CoV in Chinese swine herds. Cross-reactivity assays, indirect immunofluorescence, and western blotting assays showed that the developed ELISA had excellent SADS-CoV specificity. In total, 12,978 pig serum samples from 29 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions in China were tested from 2022 to 2023. The results showed that the general seroprevalence of SADS-CoV in China was 59.97%, with seroprevalence ranging from 16.7% to 77.12% in different provinces and from 42.61% to 68.45% in different months. SADS-CoV is widely prevalent in China, and its seroprevalence was higher in Northeast China, North China, and Central China than in other regions. Among the four seasons, the prevalence of SADS-CoV was the highest in spring and the lowest in autumn. The results of this study provide the general seroprevalence profile of SADS-CoV in China, facilitating the understanding of the prevalence of SADS-CoV in pigs. More importantly, this study is beneficial in formulating preventive and control measures for SADS-CoV and may provide directions for vaccine development.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Coronavirus Infections , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Swine Diseases , Animals , China/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Swine , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/virology , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Alphacoronavirus/immunology , Alphacoronavirus/genetics , Cross Reactions , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247965, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652474

ABSTRACT

Importance: Numerous studies have provided evidence for the negative associations of the COVID-19 pandemic with mental health, but data on the use of psychotropic medication in children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic are lacking. Objective: To assess the rates and trends of psychotropic medication prescribing before and over the 2 years after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in children and adolescents in France. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used nationwide interrupted time-series analysis of outpatient drug dispensing data from the IQVIA X-ponent database. All 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions dispensed to children (6 to 11 years of age) and adolescents (12 to 17 years of age) between January 2016 and May 2022 in France were retrieved and analyzed. Exposure: Onset of COVID-19 pandemic. Main outcomes and Measures: Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions per 1000 children and adolescents were analyzed using a quasi-Poisson regression before and after the pandemic onset (March 2020), and percentage changes in rates and trends were assessed. After the pandemic onset, rate ratios (RRs) were calculated between estimated and expected monthly prescription rates. Analyses were stratified by psychotropic medication class (antipsychotic, anxiolytic, hypnotic and sedative, antidepressant, and psychostimulant) and age group (children, adolescents). Results: In total, 8 839 143 psychotropic medication prescriptions were analyzed, 5 884 819 [66.6%] for adolescents and 2 954 324 [33.4%] for children. In January 2016, the estimated rate of monthly psychotropic medication prescriptions was 9.9 per 1000 children and adolescents, with the prepandemic rate increasing by 0.4% per month (95% CI, 0.3%-0.4%). In March 2020, the monthly prescription rate dropped by 11.5% (95% CI, -17.7% to -4.9%). During the 2 years following the pandemic onset, the trend changed significantly, and the prescription rate increased by 1.3% per month (95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%), reaching 16.1 per 1000 children and adolescents in May 2022. Monthly rates of psychotropic medication prescriptions exceeded the expected rates by 11% (RR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.14]). Increases in prescribing trends were observed for all psychotropic medication classes after the pandemic onset but were substantial for anxiolytics, hypnotics and sedatives, and antidepressants. Prescription rates rose above those expected for all psychotropic medication classes except psychostimulants (RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.09-1.15] in adolescents and 1.06 [95% CI, 1.05-1.07] in children for antipsychotics; RR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.25-1.35] in adolescents and 1.11 [95% CI, 1.09-1.12] in children for anxiolytics; RR, 2.50 [95% CI, 2.23-2.77] in adolescents and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30-1.50] in children for hypnotics and sedatives; RR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.29-1.47] in adolescents and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.20-1.25] in children for antidepressants; and RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98] in adolescents and 1.02 [95% CI, 1.00-1.04] in children for psychostimulants). Changes were more pronounced among adolescents than children. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that prescribing of psychotropic medications for children and adolescents in France significantly and persistently increased after the COVID-19 pandemic onset. Future research should identify underlying determinants to improve psychological trajectories in young people.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Psychotropic Drugs , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Child , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , France/epidemiology , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology
6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e247818, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652477

ABSTRACT

Importance: Self-report surveys suggest that long-lasting taste deficits may occur after SARS-CoV-2 infection, influencing nutrition, safety, and quality of life. However, self-reports of taste dysfunction are inaccurate, commonly reflecting deficits due to olfactory not taste system pathology; hence, quantitative testing is needed to verify the association of post-COVID-19 condition with taste function. Objective: To use well-validated self-administered psychophysical tests to investigate the association of COVID-19 with long-term outcomes in taste and smell function. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide cross-sectional study included individuals with and without a prior history of COVID-19 recruited from February 2020 to August 2023 from a social media website (Reddit) and bulletin board advertisements. In the COVID-19 cohort, there was a mean of 395 days (95% CI, 363-425 days) between diagnosis and testing. Exposure: History of COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 53-item Waterless Empirical Taste Test (WETT) and 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) were used to assess taste and smell function. Total WETT and UPSIT scores and WETT subtest scores of sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride, caffeine, and monosodium glutamate were assessed for groups with and without a COVID-19 history. The association of COVID-19 with taste and smell outcomes was assessed using analysis of covariance, χ2, and Fisher exact probability tests. Results: Tests were completed by 340 individuals with prior COVID-19 (128 males [37.6%] and 212 females [62.4%]; mean [SD] age, 39.04 [14.35] years) and 434 individuals with no such history (154 males [35.5%] and 280 females [64.5%]; mean (SD) age, 39.99 [15.61] years). Taste scores did not differ between individuals with and without previous COVID-19 (total WETT age- and sex-adjusted mean score, 33.41 [95% CI, 32.37-34.45] vs 33.46 [95% CI, 32.54-34.38]; P = .94). In contrast, UPSIT scores were lower in the group with previous COVID-19 than the group without previous COVID-19 (mean score, 34.39 [95% CI, 33.86-34.92] vs 35.86 [95% CI, 35.39-36.33]; P < .001]); 103 individuals with prior COVID-19 (30.3%) and 91 individuals without prior COVID-19 (21.0%) had some degree of dysfunction (odds ratio, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.18-2.27]). The SARS-CoV-2 variant present at the time of infection was associated with smell outcomes; individuals with original untyped and Alpha variant infections exhibited more loss than those with other variant infections; for example, total to severe loss occurred in 10 of 42 individuals with Alpha variant infections (23.8%) and 7 of 52 individuals with original variant infections (13.5%) compared with 12 of 434 individuals with no COVID-19 history (2.8%) (P < .001 for all). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, taste dysfunction as measured objectively was absent 1 year after exposure to COVID-19 while some smell loss remained in nearly one-third of individuals with this exposure, likely explaining taste complaints of many individuals with post-COVID-19 condition. Infection with earlier untyped and Alpha variants was associated with the greatest degree of smell loss.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , SARS-CoV-2 , Taste Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Taste Disorders/etiology , Taste Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Taste/physiology , Smell/physiology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Self Report , Aged
7.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 96(1): e20230791, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656058

ABSTRACT

Although control of Covid-19 has improved, the virus continues to cause infections, such as tuberculosis, that is still endemic in many countries, representing a scenario of coinfection. To compare Covid-19 clinical manifestations and outcomes between patients with active tuberculosis infection and matched controls. This is a matched case-control study based on data from the Brazilian Covid-19 Registry, in hospitalized patients aged 18 or over with laboratory confirmed Covid-19 from March 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022. Cases were patients with tuberculosis and controls were Covid-19 patients without tuberculosis. From 13,636 Covid-19, 36 also had active tuberculosis (0.0026%). Pulmonary fibrosis (5.6% vs 0.0%), illicit drug abuse (30.6% vs 3.0%), alcoholism (33.3% vs 11.9%) and smoking (50.0% vs 9.7%) were more common among patients with tuberculosis. They also had a higher frequency of nausea and vomiting (25.0% vs 10.4%). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, need for dialysis and ICU stay. Patients with TB infection presented a higher frequency of pulmonary fibrosis, abuse of illicit drugs, alcoholism, current smoking, symptoms of nausea and vomiting. The outcomes were similar between them.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Hospitalization , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Male , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Coinfection/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Registries , Tuberculosis/complications , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Pandemics , Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology
8.
Saudi Med J ; 45(4): 379-386, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38657988

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the traits and risk factors of pregnant women admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with COVID-19. Moreover, the study classifies outcomes based on differing levels of required respiratory support during their intensive care stay. METHODS: This retrospective and descriptive study included all pregnant women with COVID-19 admitted to the adult critical care unit at a specialized tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Between January 2020 and December 2022. A total of 38 pregnant women were identified and were eligible for our study. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 32.9 (19-45) years, and the average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHI IV) score was 49.9 (21-106). Approximately 60.5% of the patients suffered from superimposed infections during their ICU stay. Approximately 81.6% patients were delivered by C-section, 33 of the newborns survived, and 5 died. The crude mortality rate among pregnant women in our cohort was 15.8%. Patients treated with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) were mostly discharged or delivered normally, while the mechanical ventilation (MV) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation groups mostly underwent C-sections. Most of the surviving newborns were on HFNC and MV. Patients with multiple infections had the longest ICU stay and had the highest risk of death. CONCLUSION: The results of this study highlight the characteristics of pregnant women admitted to the ICU at a specialized tertiary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia. The APACHI IV scores accurately predicted patient's mortality, duration of MV, and length of ICU stay. In our study, we shared our experience of managing severe COVID-19 infections in pregnant patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Intensive Care Units , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Young Adult , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Infant, Newborn , Pandemics , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Risk Factors , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Tertiary Care Centers , Severity of Illness Index
9.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 2887, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575573

ABSTRACT

Anthropogenic disturbances and the subsequent loss of biodiversity are altering species abundances and communities. Since species vary in their pathogen competence, spatio-temporal changes in host assemblages may lead to changes in disease dynamics. We explore how longitudinal changes in bat species assemblages affect the disease dynamics of coronaviruses (CoVs) in more than 2300 cave-dwelling bats captured over two years from five caves in Ghana. This reveals uneven CoV infection patterns between closely related species, with the alpha-CoV 229E-like and SARS-related beta-CoV 2b emerging as multi-host pathogens. Prevalence and infection likelihood for both phylogenetically distinct CoVs is influenced by the abundance of competent species and naïve subadults. Broadly, bat species vary in CoV competence, and highly competent species are more common in less diverse communities, leading to increased CoV prevalence in less diverse bat assemblages. In line with the One Health framework, our work supports the notion that biodiversity conservation may be the most proactive measure to prevent the spread of pathogens with zoonotic potential.


Subject(s)
Chiroptera , Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Animals , Coronavirus/genetics , Prevalence , Phylogeny , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology
11.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675858

ABSTRACT

Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) causes a highly contagious respiratory disease in chickens, leading to significant economic losses in the poultry industry worldwide. IBV exhibits a high mutation rate, resulting in the continuous emergence of new variants and strains. A complete genome analysis of IBV is crucial for understanding its characteristics. However, it is challenging to obtain whole-genome sequences from IBV-infected clinical samples due to the low abundance of IBV relative to the host genome. Here, we present a novel approach employing next-generation sequencing (NGS) to directly sequence the complete genome of IBV. Through in silico analysis, six primer pairs were designed to match various genotypes, including the GI-19 lineage of IBV. The primer sets successfully amplified six overlapping fragments by long-range PCR and the size of the amplicons ranged from 3.7 to 6.4 kb, resulting in full coverage of the IBV genome. Furthermore, utilizing Illumina sequencing, we obtained the complete genome sequences of two strains belonging to the GI-19 lineage (QX genotype) from clinical samples, with 100% coverage rates, over 1000 × mean depth coverage, and a high percentage of mapped reads to the reference genomes (96.63% and 97.66%). The reported method significantly improves the whole-genome sequencing of IBVs from clinical samples; thus, it can improve understanding of the epidemiology and evolution of IBVs.


Subject(s)
Chickens , Coronavirus Infections , Genome, Viral , Genotype , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Infectious bronchitis virus , Phylogeny , Poultry Diseases , Whole Genome Sequencing , Infectious bronchitis virus/genetics , Infectious bronchitis virus/isolation & purification , Infectious bronchitis virus/classification , Animals , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Chickens/virology , Poultry Diseases/virology , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , RNA, Viral/genetics
12.
Funct Integr Genomics ; 24(3): 79, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653845

ABSTRACT

Coronaviruses have been identified as pathogens of gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases in humans and various animal species. In recent years, the global spread of new coronaviruses has had profound influences for global public health and economies worldwide. As highly pathogenic zoonotic viruses, coronaviruses have become the focus of current research. Porcine Deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), an enterovirus belonging to the family of coronaviruses, has emerged on a global scale in the past decade and significantly influenced the swine industry. Moreover, PDCoV infects not only pigs but also other species, including humans, chickens and cattles, exhibiting a broad host tropism. This emphasizes the need for in-depth studies on coronaviruses to mitigate their potential threats. In this review, we provided a comprehensive summary of the current studies on PDCoV. We first reviewed the epidemiological investigations on the global prevalence and distribution of PDCoV. Then, we delved into the studies on the pathogenesis of PDCoV to understand the mechanisms how the virus impacts its hosts. Furthermore, we also presented some exploration studies on the immune evasion mechanisms of the virus to enhance the understanding of host-virus interactions. Despite current limitations in vaccine development for PDCoV, we highlighted the inhibitory effects observed with certain substances, which offers a potential direction for future research endeavors. In conclusion, this review summarized the scientific findings in epidemiology, pathogenesis, immune evasion mechanisms and vaccine development of PDCoV. The ongoing exploration of potential vaccine candidates and the insights gained from inhibitory substances have provided a solid foundation for future vaccine development to prevent and control diseases associated with PDCoV.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Deltacoronavirus , Immune Evasion , Swine Diseases , Viral Vaccines , Animals , Swine , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Deltacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Deltacoronavirus/immunology , Deltacoronavirus/genetics , Swine Diseases/virology , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Vaccine Development , Humans
14.
Virol J ; 21(1): 84, 2024 04 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PlMERS-CoV is a coronavirus known to cause severe disease in humans, taxonomically classified under the subgenus Merbecovirus. Recent findings showed that the close relatives of MERS-CoV infecting vespertillionid bats (family Vespertillionidae), named NeoCoV and PDF-2180, use their hosts' ACE2 as their entry receptor, unlike the DPP4 receptor usage of MERS-CoV. Previous research suggests that this difference in receptor usage between these related viruses is a result of recombination. However, the precise location of the recombination breakpoints and the details of the recombination event leading to the change of receptor usage remain unclear. METHODS: We used maximum likelihood-based phylogenetics and genetic similarity comparisons to characterise the evolutionary history of all complete Merbecovirus genome sequences. Recombination events were detected by multiple computational methods implemented in the recombination detection program. To verify the influence of recombination, we inferred the phylogenetic relation of the merbecovirus genomes excluding recombinant segments and that of the viruses' receptor binding domains and examined the level of congruency between the phylogenies. Finally, the geographic distribution of the genomes was inspected to identify the possible location where the recombination event occurred. RESULTS: Similarity plot analysis and the recombination-partitioned phylogenetic inference showed that MERS-CoV is highly similar to NeoCoV (and PDF-2180) across its whole genome except for the spike-encoding region. This is confirmed to be due to recombination by confidently detecting a recombination event between the proximal ancestor of MERS-CoV and a currently unsampled merbecovirus clade. Notably, the upstream recombination breakpoint was detected in the N-terminal domain and the downstream breakpoint at the S2 subunit of spike, indicating that the acquired recombined fragment includes the receptor-binding domain. A tanglegram comparison further confirmed that the receptor binding domain-encoding region of MERS-CoV was acquired via recombination. Geographic mapping analysis on sampling sites suggests the possibility that the recombination event occurred in Africa. CONCLUSION: Together, our results suggest that recombination can lead to receptor switching of merbecoviruses during circulation in bats. These results are useful for future epidemiological assessments and surveillance to understand the spillover risk of bat coronaviruses to the human population.


Subject(s)
Chiroptera , Coronavirus Infections , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Animals , Humans , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/genetics , Phylogeny , Likelihood Functions , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Recombination, Genetic , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism
15.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 51(3): 525-530, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and vaccinations on otologic diseases, including facial nerve paralysis (including Ramsay Hunt syndrome), vestibular neuritis, sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and Meniere's disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we conducted a time-series analysis employing a causal impact algorithm on a large-scale inpatient database in Japan. We compared the actual number of hospitalized patients with otologic diseases to two predictions: one without any covariates and another with a covariate accounting for the reduction in the number of hospitalized patients due to lockdown measures. Additionally, we performed Granger causality tests to ensure the robustness of our findings. RESULTS: No significant increase was noted in the number of hospitalized patients with otologic diseases following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the causal impact analysis. Similarly, no notable surge was observed in hospitalizations for these diseases following the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccine. The Granger causality tests results aligned with the causal impact analysis findings. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that COVID-19 and vaccinations had minimal discernible effects on hospitalization of patients with otologic diseases, suggesting that otologic diseases may not be significantly impacted by COVID-19 and vaccinations, which could have implications for public health policies and the allocation of healthcare resources during a pandemic. Further research and monitoring of long-term effects are warranted to validate these findings and guide healthcare decision-making.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Japan/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/trends , Ear Diseases/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Male , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Female , Betacoronavirus , Meniere Disease/epidemiology
16.
Rev. esp. patol ; 57(1): 42-47, ene.-mar. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-229921

ABSTRACT

Subsequent to mass vaccination programs against COVID-19, diverse side effects have been described, both at the injection site, such as pain, redness and swelling, and systemic effects such as fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain. On rare occasions, a lymphadenopathic syndrome may develop, raising the clinical suspicion of a lymphoproliferative disorder. We present the case of a 30-year-old woman who developed self-limiting left axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. To date, only seven similar cases with a complete clinicopathological description have been published, and fourteen cases have been notified to the European adverse events databases (Eudravigilance) in relationship with vaccination against COVID-19. It is important to be aware of this potential complication when a lymphadenopathic syndrome develops following vaccination, to avoid unnecessary treatment. (AU)


Tras la vacunación masiva frente a la COVID-19 se han comenzado a describir diversos efectos adversos incluyendo efectos locales en el lugar de la inyección, como dolor, enrojecimiento, hinchazón, etc., y efectos sistémicos como fatiga, dolor de cabeza, dolor muscular o articular. Más infrecuentemente se pueden desarrollar cuadros linfadenopáticos sospechosos clínicamente de proceso linfoproliferativo. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 30 años que desarrolló linfadenopatía axilar izquierda tras la vacunación contra la COVID-19 con hallazgos histopatológicos de linfadenopatía necrotizante de tipo Kikuchi y resolución espontánea. Hasta el momento se han publicado 7 casos con descripción clinicopatológica completa en la literatura y notificado 14 casos en la Red Europea de Farmacovigilancia en relación con la vacunación. Es importante tener en cuenta esta entidad en linfadenopatías sospechosas de procesos linfoproliferativos en este contexto, para evitar un tratamiento innecesario. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Mass Vaccination/adverse effects , Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis
17.
Rev. esp. patol ; 57(1): 42-47, ene.-mar. 2024. ilus, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-EMG-539

ABSTRACT

Subsequent to mass vaccination programs against COVID-19, diverse side effects have been described, both at the injection site, such as pain, redness and swelling, and systemic effects such as fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain. On rare occasions, a lymphadenopathic syndrome may develop, raising the clinical suspicion of a lymphoproliferative disorder. We present the case of a 30-year-old woman who developed self-limiting left axillary lymphadenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. To date, only seven similar cases with a complete clinicopathological description have been published, and fourteen cases have been notified to the European adverse events databases (Eudravigilance) in relationship with vaccination against COVID-19. It is important to be aware of this potential complication when a lymphadenopathic syndrome develops following vaccination, to avoid unnecessary treatment. (AU)


Tras la vacunación masiva frente a la COVID-19 se han comenzado a describir diversos efectos adversos incluyendo efectos locales en el lugar de la inyección, como dolor, enrojecimiento, hinchazón, etc., y efectos sistémicos como fatiga, dolor de cabeza, dolor muscular o articular. Más infrecuentemente se pueden desarrollar cuadros linfadenopáticos sospechosos clínicamente de proceso linfoproliferativo. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 30 años que desarrolló linfadenopatía axilar izquierda tras la vacunación contra la COVID-19 con hallazgos histopatológicos de linfadenopatía necrotizante de tipo Kikuchi y resolución espontánea. Hasta el momento se han publicado 7 casos con descripción clinicopatológica completa en la literatura y notificado 14 casos en la Red Europea de Farmacovigilancia en relación con la vacunación. Es importante tener en cuenta esta entidad en linfadenopatías sospechosas de procesos linfoproliferativos en este contexto, para evitar un tratamiento innecesario. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Mass Vaccination/adverse effects , Histiocytic Necrotizing Lymphadenitis
18.
Viruses ; 16(3)2024 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38543799

ABSTRACT

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are RNA viruses capable of infecting a wide range of hosts, including mammals and birds, and have caused significant epidemics such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Bats, the second most diverse mammalian order, are hosts for various CoVs due to their unique immune responses and ecological traits. This study investigates CoV prevalence in crevice- and tree-dwelling bats in Portugal, a country with limited prior research on bat CoVs. Using nested RT-PCR and sequencing, we screened 87 stool samples from bats, identifying one sample (1.15%) that was positive for Alphacoronavirus, belonging to Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Phylogenetic analysis revealed close genetic relationships with Alphacoronavirus strains from the same bat species in Europe. The low prevalence suggests habitat-specific differences in viral transmission, with cave-dwelling bats exhibiting higher CoV prevalence due to population density and behaviour. These findings underscore the necessity for sustained surveillance efforts aimed at comprehending CoV dynamics within bat populations, especially concerning the risk of spillover events and viral evolution. Vital to this understanding is the monitoring of bat migration patterns, which serves as a crucial tool for elucidating CoV ecology and epidemiology. Such efforts are essential for ongoing research endeavours aimed at mitigating the potential for future zoonotic disease outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Alphacoronavirus , Chiroptera , Coronavirus Infections , Animals , Humans , Alphacoronavirus/genetics , Phylogeny , Portugal/epidemiology , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Genome, Viral
19.
Viruses ; 16(3)2024 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38543810

ABSTRACT

PDCoV, an enveloped RNA virus, causes atrophic enteritis in neonatal piglets, leading to diarrhea, malabsorption, dehydration, and death. The study aims to fill the gap in the current epidemiological information about PDCoV in the U.S. pig population after its emergence in 2014. Data from the Morrison Swine Health Monitoring Project (MSHMP) between January 2015 and December 2023 were analyzed, representing approximately 60% of the U.S. breeding herd. Participating herds report weekly PDCoV health status. In total, 244 PDCoV outbreaks occurred in 186 sites from 22 production systems across 16 states. Case counts peaked during winter, and incidence ranged from 0.44% in 2017 to 4.28% in 2023. For sites that experienced more than one PDCoV outbreak during the study period, the interval between outbreaks was a median of 2.11 years. The South and Midwest regions reported the majority of cases. In 2017, a shift in the spatial distribution of cases from the Midwest to the South was observed. The findings underscore the importance of continued monitoring and strengthened control measures to mitigate the impact of PDCoV in U.S. breeding herds.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Coronavirus , Swine Diseases , Animals , United States/epidemiology , Swine , Coronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Deltacoronavirus , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
20.
Nurs Open ; 11(3): e2132, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38488425

ABSTRACT

AIM: To systematically evaluate empirical studies investigating the influences of healthcare workers' behaviours towards infection prevention and control practices in the Coronavirus clinical space, and to appraise and synthesise these findings. DESIGN: A systematic review of the literature. METHODS: The review used a five-step framework described by Khan et al. (Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2003, 96 and 118) of Framing questions for a review; Identifying relevant work; Assessing the quality of studies; Summarising the evidence; and Interpreting the findings. Searches were conducted in CINHAL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to retrieve relevant peer-reviewed literature published in English between 2019 and 2023. Covidence and Joanna Briggs Quality appraisal tools were used for critical assessment. To improve transparent reporting, this review used a Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic review guidelines, as informed by Campbell et al. (BMJ, 2020, 368). RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in this review, identifying nine themes describing factors influencing HCWs' behaviours towards IPC practices in the coronavirus environment. The overarching influences emerged as knowledge-oriented, person-oriented, and environment-oriented. CONCLUSION: Healthcare workers' responsibilities at point-of-care involve providing direct care to patients with highly transmissible infections and working in clinical settings that may be ill-designed for IPC practices, increasing the risk of transmission. Given the lack of a definitive solution to eradicate new mutant viruses and that IPC practices are the mainstay of prevention and control of transmissible, measures to improve are imperative. The identified HCWs' domains on behaviours towards IPC are critical in strategies to mitigate risks and further set an opportunity for developing an IPC model congruent with the rapid response required for HCWs during emerging or re-merging mutant virus outbreaks. This is significant, given that HCWs' preparedness with IPC practices at point-of-care is central to patient care, the workforce and community safety.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Health Personnel , Humans , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...